Yes. AI can draft a reply to every new Google review in your business's voice, and Google does not prohibit AI-assisted replies as long as they are genuine responses rather than spam. The important detail is approval: replies to negative reviews should be read by a human before posting, because that is where a tone-deaf response does real damage. Dutch drafts the reply and waits for your one-click approval before anything is posted publicly.
Review replies are one of the few reputation levers a small business fully controls. Responding shows prospective customers that you are attentive, and it gives you the last word on a complaint. Most small businesses reply to fewer than half their reviews, and the ones they do reply to often read copy-pasted, which is worse than silence. The reason is not indifference, it is that replies compete with running the business.
A useful draft is specific to what the reviewer actually said, acknowledges the issue without excuses, states what changed, and invites them back. Generic gratitude is the failure mode. Here is a real example of the format for a restaurant:
Notice what makes it work: it names the specific problem, states a concrete fix, and is signed by a person. That is what an owner would write with time they do not have.
Google's policies target fake and incentivized content, not the tool used to write a genuine reply. What actually gets businesses in trouble is asking for reviews in exchange for discounts, posting fake reviews, or review-gating. A sincere reply drafted with AI and approved by the owner is not against the rules.
The real risk is not policy, it is tone. An automated reply that misreads an angry review and thanks them for their feedback makes the situation visibly worse, in public, permanently. That is the entire argument for human approval.
Dutch watches your Google Business Profile for new reviews and drafts a reply to each one in your voice, warm for praise and calm and specific for complaints. Angry reviews are flagged for you first. You approve with one click and it posts. Nothing goes public without your approval. It starts at $79 per month with a 30-day free trial.
If you get very few reviews, this is not worth automating: replying yourself takes minutes a month. It is worth it when the volume is enough that replies slip, or when reviews arrive at the worst times, like a Friday night service. Also, no reply fixes a genuinely bad experience. Replies protect your reputation with future readers; they do not substitute for fixing the underlying problem.
Google's policies prohibit fake, incentivized, and spam content. They do not prohibit using AI to help write a genuine reply from the business. The reply should be a real response to a real review, which is what matters.
Yes, and those are the most important ones to get right. Future customers read how you handle criticism more closely than they read the praise. Reply specifically, acknowledge the issue, say what changed, and avoid arguing.
Dutch does not, by design. Every reply waits for your approval. For negative reviews especially, an unreviewed automated response is a real risk, because it is public and permanent.
Dutch checks for new reviews on a schedule and drafts replies for your approval, so the practical turnaround is same-day to a few days depending on cadence. The bottleneck is your approval, which takes one click.
Describe the job in plain English. Dutch scopes it and prices it on the spot. 30 days free, no contract.
Build an agent →